2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2015 2016 2017 aspnet azure csharp debugging elasticsearch exceptions firefox javascriptajax linux llblgen mongodb powershell projects python security services silverlight training videos wcf wpf xag xhtmlcss

Firefox 2.0 Officially Released!

Firefox 2.0 Officially Released!

The world's most powerful web access system has now been released in a new version: 2.0.

A few of the new features in Firefox 2.0 are:

  • In any text box you now have a SPELL CHECKER! So, if you are typing a comment in a form... you have little red underlines for misspelled words (goodness, I'm seeing them all over this e-mail. I just have to right click and fix it).
  • It's prettier for Mac and Vista people.
  • When you type in the search bar it starts to give you suggestions as to what you may be looking for.
  • Phishing protection -- Phishing is when you go to a website that says "Welcome to eBay! Give us your credit card number to continue service!". Firefox (and well most web browsers now these days) helps protect against that.
  • It handles even MORE powerful websites and intranets (Internet Explorer is finally caught up to 2003).
  • You ever want to restart your computer or just for (some odd reason and hopefully very rare reason) shut your down your computer and want to remember what you were doing? Well, now you can close Firefox and when you reopen it you have the option of continuing right when you left off (thank you Firefox 2.0 spell checker-- I could NOT spell continuing!). So, if you have 9 or so tabs open then you can have them all back when you restart your Firefox 2.0. Opera people have had this for a long time and many Firefox users had an extension that gave them this ability, but now it's finally native.

For those of you who are in a corporate environment (which is just about everyone in my target audience I suppose), to deploy Firefox in your corporate environment you won't want to install Mozilla Firefox directly, but rather, you will probably want to use FrontMotion Firefox. You can get this from FrontMotion's website. As of the time of this writing they haven't released the new 2.0 MSI (how could they... it was JUST officially released!), but in a few days they should have it posted. This Firefox is an MSI version that allows deployment via Active Directory ("AD"), which if very cool and REALLY needs to be native to Firefox anyhow. FrontMotion also provided administrative templates for your Firefox AD deployment. Their mozilla.adm template is a very powerful template allow customization of many aspects of the Firefox internal registry.

As a reminder, you can extend Firefox in any which way you want. I don't mean by using "add ons" in general, but I mean extensions. Don't like something? Fix it... Here are some extensions that I have installed everywhere.

  • All-in-One Sidebar
  • IETab
  • Download Statusbar

FrontMotion will also customize your corporate Firefox to have to extensions that you want in your MSI. What if you want to install Firefox extensions AFTER the MSI install? Well, the way to do that is simple and it does not involve a sissy GUI. Most people think that when you install a Firefox extension it's installed in the entire system. That's not true. Firefox extensions are per profile, not per operating system login nor per system. If you want to install an extension on a system use the following command.

firefox.exe --install-global-extension MyExtensionName.xpi

That will install the Firefox extension globally on the machine. This command is something you can definately package in an MSI yourself and if you know anything about MSI and AD deployment, then you know that you can set prerequisites, which will allow you to deploy the extensions after Firefox 2.0 is installed. Now, as with all properly designed software, Firefox extensions are versioned. Extension are versioned not only to have their own version, but they are versioned to work with specificially tested versions of Firefox (thats actually a Firefox extension development best practice). So, version your Firefox extension MSI packages so that you can tell AD to deploy the new versions as needed.

Given my audience, I think it would be a good idea to make a few statements about about the architecture of Firefox. This week I was at the HDC06 convention and one of the keynote speakers said something to the effect of "COM was never really implemented anywhere else other than in Microsoft operating systems" (that's a super paraphrase). Obviously that's not true... but one place it is definately not true is with Firefox. Internally Firefox has a technology called XPCOM (Cross Platform COM) that looks and feels much like Microsoft's implementation of COM (though a lot cleaner). You have interfaces and you query interfaces... blah blah blah. If you know COM, you know know what I mean.

Firefox also has it's own internal registry kinda like the Windows registry, except it's actually intuitive and it's not yet bloated to the point of complete uselessness. To access the Firefox registry, simply put "about:config" (with out the quotes) in the address bar. This allows you to customize just about anything about Firefox. As with anything, some of the really awesome stuff isn't directly seen in there (i.e. there aren't entries or "keys" for them by default), but the many Mozilla-specific websites have great documentation on how to customize and tweak your web system to your own likings. There's not really any limit to what you can do with the Firefox registry, so any documentation you see will by in some sense be incomplete, though MozillaZine's documenation is great for much of the Firefox registry defaults. You can tweak anything form the lowest geekiest component to something web developer-ish like toggling strict JavaScript mode on (... remember the Option Strict in VB? Same type of thing...) So, you may wanna dive into that depending on your needs (btw, if you see bold entries... that means they have been changed from their defaults or they have been added -- by an extension, by you, or by something else; they just aren't at their default state.) With regard to AD deployment, this Firefox registry type of stuff is what the mozilla.adm AD template will allow you to control in your AD group policy.

Lastly, for those of you have haven't seen my Firefox Web Developer videos, you can view them at the below links. Even though the videos were created using Firefox 1.0, everything in them is still true in Firefox 2.0. In the future I may released more videos, but for now what's posted is all I have prepared. I had one last video in the series , but "something" happened and it got cut in half.

So, if you haven't done so already GetFirefox.com today and help spread the goodness around the world and into your corporation

Links in this Entry

My Firefox Web Developer Video Series Link

New Blog Engine

The other day I got sick and tired of the fact that I didn't have labels on my entires... sure Blogger Beta allows for that, but you have to be on their server to use it (and understandably so). So last weekend I wrote my own blog engine in .NET 2.0. Sure I could have used a pre-built one (like DasBlog), but I kinda like the level of control I get from using things with my architecture and my coding style. Yes, I know that's a ridiculous and somewhat arrogant excuse, but I really do like to have it in my own architecture and design even if own as a training tool I can use in the future.

Anyhow... the new system has been up for a few days and if you see any weird behavior on it (like a blog entry link taking you to the homepage or whatever), please be assured that I get a notification e-mail about the problem and will quickly look into it. I'm still considering it in "beta".

With the new blog engine you can access labels to view various entires at once as well as see articles by month by going to http://www.netfxharmonics.com/year/month/ like http://www.netfxharmonics.com/2006/10/.

There are various other nice internal features too, like the ability for each entry to have more than one URL. Some of my blog entries are actually linked via different links, so that's something that is definitely important to me.

Oh, how did I do that you ask? HttpHandlers! These ASP.NET pieces of goodness are great. My entire blog is really just one public page: default.aspx (plus the internal supporting user controls, masterpage and clientside JavaScript and CSS pages). There isn't really a link called http://www.netfxharmonics.com/2005/12/video-1-fwd-setting-up-your-firefox.aspx. When ASP.NET sees that URL being requested, the HttpHandler parses it and sends the information off to the default.aspx page which then looks up the blog entry data (via an adapter which then accesses LLBLGen) and sends that data back to the client who thinks that's a real page (even Google indexes it as a real page).

Another cool thing is something I mentioned before: each page can have more than one url. So, for example, the following two URLs show the same data (via a simple lookup in a table which contains the URL names).

As far as tracking, I did throw in a simple tracking system so I can log all traffic via IP address, session, and many other things. I really only did that so I can watch myself go through the site for debugging purposes. My REAL tracking is done via the awesome Google Analytics service which I have been using since it's release. I even have it on all the e-commerce sites we host at the office (replacing WebTrends!). Google Analytics is awesome. Google is awesome!

This weekend I'm going to be builtng in a Atom/RSS creation system that will give a feed to FeedBurner for the RSS subscribers to see (if you aren't using FeedBurner to serve your feeds, you really should--it abstracts the URL from your site so you can change your REAL feed location all you want and it gives you great stats as well). I'm actually going to implement my IAP (doesn't really stand for anything) engine which allows developers to dynamically create report templates and RSS feeds declaratively. We also use this at the office... it's actually really cool. It's not only an RSS server, but also an RSS aggregator. So, at the office, we use my IAP engine in the company portal to show blocks of information (they are simply RSS feeds shown via a custom ASP.NET control like ). So... implementing the new RSS system should be really simple.

As far as a client... I think that the web is kind of a hassle for client work. Personally I've grown to hate it. Back in the day I was all about web applications. I thought they were so cool, but I'm all about smart clients now. So, I wrote my blog editing application in WPF which, naturally, communicates with the server via WCF. The interface was rather simple to build in WPF as WPF it has the the advantages of WinForms with regard to simplicity and the power and awesome control tree model of ASP.NET. Great stuff...

The internal database is SQL Server 2005 Express. I swear... that thing is so cool. I've been using it for some time now and I have to say that I SO don't see myself ever needing the standard edition. Even at the office we don't need the standard edition for most of our databases (our CRM system needs standard for it's 60GB database, but other than that... Express works great). Oh... and YES, LLBLGen Pro 2.0 is the data access layer. That thing is so awesome.

As far as hosting. I love abstraction and delegation, so I don't see myself ever doing self-hosting. That said, I'm always looking for the best deal. That doesn't mean LOWEST price. "Best deal" in my situation is a metric of many factors. So, I use CrystalTech's dedicated web hosting for hosting the site (as well as MANY others) and I use the same box for my development work as well. It may just be a Celeron, but I have 1GB of RAM it in with everything I need. I can do anything from WPF to WF to WCF to Atlas on this thing. Granted I have to work with my own DNS and IIS configuration... but, serious, if you can't do that, you shouldn't even be in the biz.

I think that covers most everything. So, if you see something weird in the system, I can almost guarantee that there was an internal exception thrown and that I was notified of it with detailed in information of the failure.

Brad Abram's Presentation

Anyone who knows me knows I'm an architect and designer at heart... every time I see construction work I just stare at it and study how everything is being planned. Heck, I learned much of software architecture from watching Discovery Channel's Extreme Engineering. I love the stuff... ergo, Brad Abrams is my hero. His work is astonishing. As far as I'm concerned he is the glue that kept the BCL together.

Everyone NEEDS to check out his latest presentation on design guidelines. This is some good stuff. Usually I think PowerPoint is a mind numbing waste of time, but this presentation is great. By the way, if you don't OWN the design guidelines book by Krzysztof Cwalina and Brad Abrams, YOU NEED TO. If you never looked at it, please stop writing code today.

Check it out...

C# 3.0 Features at MSDN Nuggets

The MSDN Nuggets website has just released a TON of awesome videos about new C# 3.0 features. Personally I love the stuff they are doing with the LINQ project. It's going to make the awesome C# 2.0 language even more powerful and flexible.

The site also released a cool video about how to get Vista's glass to work in your apps. By the way, if you're interested in the workflow foundation, there are a ton of videos on that as well.

Here are the videos...

The Uncatchable Exception

There's once aspect of exception handling that I've found that many seasoned .NET veterans know about. Take a look at the following code...

class Node {
    private Node node;

    public Node ChildNode {
        get {
            if (node == null) {
                node = new Node( );
            return node;
        set { node = value; }

class Program
    static void ProcessNode(Node node) {

    static void Main(string[] args) {
        try {
            ProcessNode(new Node( ));
        catch (StackOverflowException ex) {
        catch (Exception ex) {

Code Segment 1

What do you figure the output will be? Well, most people say the output is something like "Operation caused a stack overflow." That's a nice guess, but this exception thrown from the CLR is actually not catchable. This is the uncatchable exception. It actually jumps directly outside of your try block and shuts your application down. What you actually see is what's in the below figure.


Figure 1

The CLR does not allow you to have infinite loops in your applications at all. So much so in fact that it will literally kill your entire application to make sure you follow the rules.

Now, if you're thinking about it... you may be think "CLR threw it? Hmm... I wonder... I read something about the ability to throw things that aren't exceptions". So, you may be tempted to try this...

try {
    ProcessNode(new Node( ));
catch {
    Console.WriteLine("Unknown exception");

Code Segment 2

This actually doesn't help the situation at all. Actually, if you've read my previous blog entry on the RuntimeWrappedException, then you would know about the .NET wrapping plan. Under .NET's default rules, thrown objects which do not inherit from System.Exception are wrapped in an instance of RuntimeWrappedException. So, even if the exception thrown was one of those, it would have been caught by the original code anyhow.

This StackOverFlowException application failure is actually a very helpful rule the CLR enforces. It forces you to go back and make sure you don't have a recursion bug in your code, because this is not really a user-specific exception it's literally a bug in your application. So, before you throw a fit when you see this, just go back and find the bug in your recursion code.

It's important to note however, that there's nothing inherently special about the StackOverFlowException itself. Take a look at this code...

static void ThrowStackOverFlowException( ) {
    throw new StackOverflowException( );

static void Main(string[] args) {
    try {
        ThrowStackOverFlowException( );
    catch (StackOverflowException ex) {

Code Segment 3

This time your output really is "Operation caused a stack overflow.". So, if you throw it yourself you can catch it. The uncatchable exception isn't really StackOverflowException, but rather the CLR's throwing of the StackOverflowException.

There are other ways to completely kill an application. One of the more subtle of ways is via use of System.Environment.FastFail(String message). This static method will immediately kill and application and will not be caught by any catch blocks anywhere. So, if you really want to screw up an application simply do the following...

public class SalesOrderException : Exception
    public SalesOrderException( ) {

    // More constructors go here...

Code Segment 4

Now every time your application has a SalesOrderException, it will explode into pieces. There's absolutely no way to recover from this. The above code is something that a disguntled employee would love to check in.

That said, looking at it in another light, Environment.FastFail(String) can actually be a great debugging tool. For example, say you have an application that is just downright giving you some weird output. You have no idea why. You know it's wrong, but there are just no exceptions bubbling to the surface to help you out. Well, if you have access to Visual Studio 2005's Debug->Exceptions... menu item, you can actually tell Visual Studio to allow you to see those first chance exceptions. If you don't have that, however you can put Environment.FastFail(String) in an exception, and use deductive reasoning and process of elimination to find out where your problem in.

You may actually be wondering "What is the point of Environment.FastFail(String)?" It's actually quite useful for anyone severely uptight about security or someone withing really low level in a system. If you're absolutely sure there's an unrecoverable corruption in your system, then you can call this method to kill this application. Basically what you're doing is "blue screening your application". The operating system is untouched, but you application is gone. Another situation someone can use Environment.FastFail in in security situations. If you absolutely need to verify some piece of security for the application to continue at all (i.e. you don't want anyone to catch an exception you throw and continue insecure), then you can use this method to "bluescreen" the app.